Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ASGN Incorporated et al v. Highland Federal, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00294
Claimant:
Highland Federal, LLC, ECS Federal Holding Co., Kapani Family 2012 Irrevocable Trust and others
Interpleader:
ASGN Incorporated and ECS Federal LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee:
GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant:
BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant:
BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
US v. Government Logistics N.V.
as 15-1207
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL. KURT BUNK AND RAY AMMONS and UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., MARC SMET and GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V.
Defendant:
BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ANDREAS CHRIST SPEDITION & MOBELTRANSPORT GMBH and others
US ex rel. Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving
as 15-1088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL. KURT BUNK AND RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., GOSSELIN GROUP N.V., GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V. and others
Defendant:
BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ANDREAS CHRIST SPEDITION & MOBELTRANSPORT GMBH and others
:
Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al
as 3:2013cv00467
Petitioner:
Lee Ann Pridgeon , L.I.G.Services, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Respondent:
Rick Ryan Pegram , Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al
as 4:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Pridgeon , L.I.G.Services, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Defendant:
Rick Ryan Pegram, Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al
as 5:2012cv00750
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Pridgeon , L.I.G.Services, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Defendant:
Rick Ryan Pegram, Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
United States of America v. Gosselin World Wide Moving
as 12-1494
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V., GOSSELIN GROUP N.V. and MARC SMET
Defendant:
BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
