Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Murray Energy Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Murray Energy Corporation
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , GINA McCARTHY , United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
South Carolina Coastal v. United States Army Corp
as 14-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Charleston District, SA JOHN M. MCHUGH, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the US Army, LTG THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and others
Preservation Society v. United States Army Corp
as 13-2401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF CHARLESTON and SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN M. MCHUGH, In his Official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Army and THOMAS P. BOSTICK, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Engineers
Intervenor/Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA PORTS AUTHORITY
Preservation Society v. South Carolina Ports Authority
as 13-2280
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF CHARLESTON and SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN M. MCHUGH, In his Official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Army and THOMAS P. BOSTICK, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Engineers
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
SOUTH CAROLINA PORTS AUTHORITY
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al
as 2:2013cv01543
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District, Edward Chamberlayne, John M McHugh and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Preservation Society of Charleston et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2012cv02942
Plaintiff:
Preservation Society of Charleston and South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , John M McHugh and Thomas P Bostick
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ohio Valley Environmental Coal v. US Army Corps of Eng
as 12-1999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, Inc., WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INCORPORATED, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Commander and Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and ROBERT D. PETERSON, Colonel, District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
HIGHLAND MINING COMPANY
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition et al v. Temple et al
as 3:2012cv02291
Plaintiff:
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition , Coal River Mountain Watch , West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and others
Defendant:
Meredith W.B. Temple , Robert D. Peterson and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Intervenor_defendant:
Fola Coal Company, LLC and Loadout, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2012cv02291
Plaintiff:
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition , Coal River Mountain Watch , West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , Meredith W. B. Temple and Robert D. Peterson
Intervenor_defendant:
Fola Coal Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Village of Bald Head Island v. U. S. Army Corps of Eng
as 11-2368
Plaintiff:
VILLAGE OF BALD HEAD ISLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
TOWN OF CASWELL BEACH and TOWN OF OAK ISLAND, NORTH CAROLINA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
