Environmental Matters Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
State of Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00459
Defendant: Cumberland Farms, Inc., Shell Oil Products Company LLC, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff: State of Maryland
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00707
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, SECRETARY OF NATURAL RESOURCES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
APPALACHIAN VOICES, ET AL. V. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
as 1:2017cv01097
Plaintiff: APPALACHIAN VOICES , NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP and STOKES COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP
Defendant: DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION v. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00707
Plaintiff: ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION
Defendant: DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION v. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00561
Plaintiff: ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION
Defendant: DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION v. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
as 1:2017cv00452
Plaintiff: ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION
Defendant: DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. 3M Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00460
Defendant: Tennessee Associated Electric, Inc. or Tennessee Associated Electric, Union Electric Company, American Electric Corporation and others
Special Master: David O Ledbetter and Mr. David Oscar Ledbetter
Petitioner: United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff: Duke Energy Progress, LLC doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant: Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff: PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Barnes & Powell Electrical Company, Inc., Trinity Industries, Inc., Georgia-Pacific, LLC and others
Counter Defendant: Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cross Claimant: Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina and/or SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc. and/or SMI Steel
Counter Claimant: Ohio Valley Medical Center, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00463
Defendant: Veolia Environmental Services Waste-to-Energy, Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., Duke Energy Progress, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant: Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
Special Master: David O Ledbetter
3Rd Party Defendant: The North Carolina Granite Corporation, FABRI-KAL Corporation, The National Lime and Stone Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Petitioner: United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cross Defendant: Electric Equipment Corporation of Virginia, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated.
Plaintiff: Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION V. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
as 1:2016cv00607
Plaintiff: ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION
Defendant: DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
CAPE FEAR RIVER WATCH, INC. et al v. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
as 1:2014cv00752
Plaintiff: CAPE FEAR RIVER WATCH, INC. and WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE, INC.
Defendant: DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?