Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Hughes v. Rosenberg et al
as 1:2015cv01770
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Hughes
Defendant:
Diane S. Rosenberg, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA , Wells Fargo Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowen v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 8:2015cv01678
Plaintiff:
Jeffery L Bowen
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walsh v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 8:2015cv00934
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Walsh
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, MERSCORP, Inc., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ruther v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 1:2014cv00486
Plaintiff:
L. Ruther
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eiser v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 3:2013cv02751
Plaintiff:
Dana Eiser
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ervin v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 1:2013cv02080
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Ervin
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Tant v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
as 5:2013cv00410
Plaintiff:
Jewel Tant
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v. Mace et al
as 4:2012cv02511
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Defendant:
Russell W Mace, III and Nicole N Mace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v. Guertin et al
as 3:2012cv02363
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Defendant:
Timothy R Guertin and Robin Guertin
Counter_claimant:
Timothy R Guertin and Robin Guertin
Counter_defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wynn v. White et al
as 3:2012cv00572
Plaintiff:
Rosa S. Wynn
Defendant:
Samuel I. White, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., Mortgage Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
