Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Barton College v. Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership
as 5:2019cv00318
Defendant:
Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership
Plaintiff:
Barton College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC v. Hernandez
as 7:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Defendant:
David A. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARAMARK Educational Services, LLC v. George Mason University
as 1:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
ARAMARK Educational Services, LLC
Defendant:
George Mason University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Veolia Transportation Services, Inc. v. Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2010cv00377
Plaintiff:
Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership and Thong Khoune Sisaath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin's Stadium, Inc. v. Aramark Corporation
as 1:2009cv01142
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Martin's Stadium, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. v. ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2008cv00392
Petitioner:
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Respondent:
ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DPR Construction, Inc. v. Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc et al
as 4:2007cv00097
Plaintiff:
DPR Construction, Inc. and DPR Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PACE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
NANCY PACE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Mediator:
JONATHAN R. HARKAVY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
