Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Speed v. Seay et al
as 1:2020cv01067
Defendant:
Quinton S. Seay, Esq., Stewart, Seay & Felton and Continental Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Henry Speed, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins et al v. Del Castro et al
as 8:2018cv03503
Plaintiff:
Grace Collins and Duk Sun Lyu
Defendant:
Saban Films, Inc., Hannibal Productions, Inc., Patricia Eberle Rionda Del Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Collins et al v. Del Castro et al
as 8:2018cv03503
Plaintiff:
Grace Collins and Duk Sun Lyu
Defendant:
Saban Films, Inc., Hannibal Productions, Inc., Patricia Eberle Rionda Del Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Speed Trac Technologies, Incor v. Estes Express Lines, Incorpora
as 09-1279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPEED TRAC TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
ESTES EXPRESS LINES, INCORPORATED, a Virginia Corporation
Speeding Global Corp. v. T2 International, LLC et al
as 5:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Speeding Global Corp. and Speeding Global Corp.
Defendant:
T2 International, LLC, T2 International, LLC, Tara Youngblood and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Speed Trac Technologies, Inc., Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. and Speed Trac Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines, Inc. and Estes Express Lines, Inc.
Mediator:
Thomas C. Duncan
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPEED TRAC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. ESTES EXPRESS LINES, INC.
as 1:2007cv00417
Plaintiff:
SPEED TRAC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
ESTES EXPRESS LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cane Creek Cycling Components v. Tien Hsin Industries Co., Ltd.
as 1:2007cv00133
Defendant:
Tien Hsin Industries Co., Ltd., Full Speed Ahead, Inc. and Full Speed Ahead, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cane Creek Cycling Components
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
