Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Allergan, Incorporated v. Apotex, Incorporated
as 13-1236
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALLERGAN, INCORPORATED and DUKE UNIVERSITY
Defendant - Appellant:
APOTEX, INCORPORATED, APOTEX CORPORATION, SANDOZ INCORPORATED and others
Precision BioSciences, Inc. et al v. Cellectis SA et al
as 5:2012cv00719
Plaintiff:
Precision BioSciences, Inc. and Duke University
Defendant:
Cellectis SA, Cellectis bioresearch and Cellectis bioresearch Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ALLERGAN, INC., et al v. WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al
as 1:2012cv00321
Plaintiff:
ALLERGAN, INC. and DUKE UNIVERSITY
Defendant:
WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. and WATSON PHARMA, INC.
Counter_claimant:
WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and WATSON PHARMA, INC.
Counter_defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC. and DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Lumeris, Inc. v. Duke University Health System, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Lumeris, Inc.
Defendant:
Duke University Health System, Inc. and Duke University
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
ALLERGAN, INC. et al v. HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC.
as 1:2011cv00650
Plaintiff:
ALLERGAN, INC. and DUKE UNIVERSITY
Defendant:
HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ALLERGAN, INC., et al v. SANDOZ, INC.
as 1:2011cv00298
Plaintiff:
ALLERGAN, INC. and DUKE UNIVERSITY
Defendant:
SANDOZ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
ALLERGAN, INC. et al v. APOTEX INC., et al
as 1:2010cv00681
Plaintiff:
ALLERGAN, INC. and DUKE UNIVERSITY
Defendant:
APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Duke of Earl et al v. Baker
as 6:2007cv04062
Plaintiff:
Duke of Earl, Duke of Earl, EMI Virgin Music Inc and others
Defendant:
Charles E Baker
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
