Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00519
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Amber Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Akins v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jordan Akins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Jordan-Tisdale v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Toneisha Jordan-Tisdale
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MCARN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA JORDAN MCARN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jordan v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Rachel Jordan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Wyatt v. Commissioner of the Social Security
as 1:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
Wesley Jordan Wyatt
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Jordan v. Saul
as 8:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Carlton Cyril Jordan
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jordan v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00499
Plaintiff:
Robbie Jordan and Robbie Mallieu Jordan
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jordan-Tisdale v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00113
Plaintiff:
Toneisha Jordan-Tisdale
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
JORDAN v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00820
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
BURAL N. JORDAN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
