Cases 1 - 10 of 5,487
GATEWOOD v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
ERIC GATEWOOD
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BARNEY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
MICINDA BARNEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
McArthur v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tonya McArthur
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Coates v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Coates
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Brown
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Wright v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
James Glenn Wright
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Wright v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
James Glenn Wright
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Moore v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Carol Moore
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Livesay v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
April Livesay
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Livesay v. O'Malley DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE # 5:24-CV-272-D-RJ.
as 4:2024cv00068
Defendant:
April D. Livesay and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
