Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Nichols v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Brenda Nichols
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nichols v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2022cv04724
Plaintiff:
Bryan Shane Nichols
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nichols v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00930
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nichols
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Belanger v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Nichole Belanger
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fruik v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00067
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Elaina Nichols Fruik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Floyd v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Porsha Nichole Boyce Floyd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Widmer v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00008
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Amber Nichol Widmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Widmer v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Amber Nichol Widmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
VAUGHN v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00001
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NICHOLE VAUGHN
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lane v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00267
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Nichole Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
