Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Craig v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Stacey Craig
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Stacey Lynn Anderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Williams v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Stacey Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fisher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv02362
Plaintiff:
Stacey Robin Fisher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thompson v. Saul
as 7:2021cv00011
Plaintiff:
Stacey Thompson
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Davis v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00978
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Stacey Reynolds Davis
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Roots v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00858
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Stacey Denise Roots
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McClellon v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv03216
Plaintiff:
James Stacey McClellon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Leverett v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00380
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
STACEY LEVERETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allen v. Berryhill
as 7:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
Stacey Allen
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
