Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Pinksaw v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Warren James Pinksaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
COWAN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
THEODORE WARREN COWAN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Warren v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv04291
Plaintiff:
Peggy Marie Warren
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Spaulding v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Warren Spaulding
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Warren v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2021cv00921
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Plaintiff:
Kelvin D. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Warren v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2020cv03854
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Peggy Marie Warren
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Warren v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Chester Kareen Warren
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Spaulding v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00224
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Warren A Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Warren v. Saul
as 7:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Ruby Elaine Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hayes v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00040
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Warren Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
