Cases 91 - 100 of 105
US v. Charles Penland, Sr.
as 09-4759
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Party-in-Interest - Appellant:
MARY PENLAND
Party-in-Interest - None:
326 HANSA LANE GREER SC, 4318 EAST NORTH STREET and KENNETH C. ANTHONY, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES W. PENLAND, SR.
Movant - None:
JERRY SAAD
-SVH McDaniels v. SC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv01731
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne McDaniels
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , Samuel B Glover , Dr Beiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
-SVH McDaniels v. SC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv01732
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne McDaniels
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , Samuel B Glover , Dr Beiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
US v. Perren Lane
as 09-4260
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PERREN LAMONTE LANE
Agner v. Shapiro
as 2:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nolan Lane Agner
Defendant:
Joshua Barrett Shapiro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Agner v. Shapiro
as 2:2009cv00045
Plaintiff:
Nolan Lane Agner
Defendant:
Joshua Barrett Shapiro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Agner v. Shapiro
as 2:2008cv00620
Plaintiff:
Nolan Lane Agner
Defendant:
Joshua Barrett Shapiro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Raynor v. Wentz et al
as 5:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
Linda Raynor
Defendant:
Bill Wentz, Cheryl Dickensheets, Dane Bayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Real Property located at 6124
as 08-4326
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - None:
ANN MUNSON
Defendant - None:
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6124 MARY LANE DRIVE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
Movant - Appellant:
JAMES EDGAR MUNSON
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. McCorkle
as 3:2008cv00038
Defendant:
Britton Lane McCorkle and B.H.B. Enterprieses, Inc. d/b/a Vinnie's Sardines Southend
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
