Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 19-6837
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 19-6528
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
Napoleon Rankin Bey v. Layton Oxendine
as 19-6719
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN MADDOX, LIEUTENANT ODOM, CAPTAIN LOCKLEAR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY
Treston Harris v. Anne Maddox
as 19-6344
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNE MADDOX, Hearing Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRESTON HARRIS
Shahid Muslim v. Irwin Carmichael
as 19-6170
Defendant / Appellee:
MADDOX, Chaplain, IRWIN CARMICHAEL, Sheriff and DENNIS, Head Chaplain
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAHID HASSAN MUSLIM
Mehta v. Maddox et al
as 1:2016cv01616
Plaintiff:
Darshan Mehta
Defendant:
Lynda Maddox and Donald Maddox
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Maddox v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 1:2015cv01032
Plaintiff:
Pamela Maddox
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Marvin Maddox
as 10-5188
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARVIN O'BRIAN MADDOX, a/k/a O'Brian Maddox, a/k/a O'Brien Maddox, a/k/a O'Brien Marvin Maddox
Owens v. McMasters et al
as 2:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Curtis Q Owens
Defendant:
Henery McMasters , Jon Ozmint , Oscar Faulkenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
