Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 659
In re: Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-1893
Petitioner: In re: JEFFREY LOHMAN and LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY LOHMAN
Riman v. Koort et al
as 1:2023cv01099
Defendant: Tanya Harvey doing business as NEWREZ LLC formerly known as New Penn Financial, LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Peter Koort VSB #34170 doing business as Equity Trustees, LLC, Carrie M. Ward doing business as BWW Law Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Omini Riman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02112
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02112
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Capital Broadcasting Company, Incorporated v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1796
Plaintiff / Appellant: CAPITAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, MCCLATCHY COMPANY, LLC, d/b/a The News and Observer Publishing Company and JAMES S. FARRIN, P.C., d/b/a Law Offices of James Scott Farrin
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA and others
FTC v. Andris Pukke
as 23-1742
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, PETER BAKER, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco Futures Development, Eco Futures Bel and JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and
Defendant: ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation, ECO FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a company organized under the laws of Belize, BUY BELIZE, LLC, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, d/b/a Kanantik, d/b/a Laguna Palms, d/b/a Bamboo Springs, a California limited liability company and others
Respondent: CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor: THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JULIE SANTOS and others
Trustee: CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
Receiver: MARC-PHILIP FERZAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
disAbility Law Center of Virginia v. HCA Health Services of Virginia Inc.
as 3:2023cv00259
Plaintiff: disAbility Law Center of Virginia
Defendant: HCA Health Services of Virginia Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1344
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Southern Environmental Law Center v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
as 2:2023cv00869
Plaintiff: Southern Environmental Law Center
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?