Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 47
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors
as 1:2011cv01201
Plaintiff: T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Defendant: The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Fisher We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2011cv02245
Plaintiff: AT&T Mobility LLC
Defendant: Lara Fisher
Amicu: Communication Workers of America
Movant: State of Utah, State of Alabama, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00262
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. City Council of Newport New We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1293
Plaintiff - Appellee: T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Defendant - Appellant: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA and CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA
T-Mobile Northeast LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00729
Plaintiff: T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Defendant: Howard County Board of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Fairfax County Board We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1060
Plaintiff - Appellant: T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Defendant - Appellee: FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Defendant: FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Fairfax County Board We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2381
Plaintiff - Appellant: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility
Defendant - Appellee: THE FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Alltel Communications, LLC v. Edward Finley, Jr.
as 10-2243
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Plaintiff: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility, on behalf of itself and its wireless operating affiliates
Defendant - Appellee: EDWARD S. FINLEY, JR., Chairman (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission), WILLIAM T. CULPEPPER, III, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission), BRYAN E. BEATTY, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission) and others
Defendant: ROBERT V. OWENS, JR., Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilites Commission) and HOWARD N. LEE, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utitlies Commission)
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Edward Finley, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2221
Plaintiff - Appellant: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility, on behalf of itself and its wireless operating affiliates and ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Defendant - Appellee: EDWARD S. FINLEY, JR., Chairman (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission), WILLIAM T. CULPEPPER, III, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission), BRYAN E. BEATTY, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission) and others
Defendant: ROBERT V. OWENS, JR., Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilites Commission) and HOWARD N. LEE, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utitlies Commission)
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. The City Council of the City of Newport News, Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00082
Plaintiff: T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Defendant: The City Council of the City of Newport News, Virginia and The City of Newport News, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?