Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Bridlewood Development LLC et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2014cv03741
Plaintiff: Bridlewood Development LLC , Whitehorse LLC , Gorden Timmons and others
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and John T Litz
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
South Carolina Coastal v. United States Army Corp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant: SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Charleston District, SA JOHN M. MCHUGH, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the US Army, LTG THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and others
Precon Development Corporation v. US Army Corps of Engineer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2499
Plaintiff - Appellant: PRECON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Preservation Society v. United States Army Corp
as 13-2401
Plaintiff - Appellee: PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF CHARLESTON and SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN M. MCHUGH, In his Official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Army and THOMAS P. BOSTICK, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Engineers
Intervenor/Defendant: SOUTH CAROLINA PORTS AUTHORITY
Preservation Society v. South Carolina Ports Authority
as 13-2280
Plaintiff - Appellee: PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF CHARLESTON and SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN M. MCHUGH, In his Official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Army and THOMAS P. BOSTICK, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Engineers
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant: SOUTH CAROLINA PORTS AUTHORITY
Craig et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2013cv01767
Plaintiff: William F Craig, III and F Ragin Craig
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P Bostick, Edward Chamberlayne and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al
as 2:2013cv01543
Plaintiff: South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District, Edward Chamberlayne, John M McHugh and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06689
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P. Bostick and Steven McGugan
Plaintiff: Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. , West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. , Sierra Club and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Preservation Society of Charleston et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2012cv02942
Plaintiff: Preservation Society of Charleston and South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers , John M McHugh and Thomas P Bostick
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ohio Valley Environmental Coal v. US Army Corps of Eng We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1999
Plaintiff - Appellant: OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, Inc., WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INCORPORATED, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Commander and Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and ROBERT D. PETERSON, Colonel, District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: HIGHLAND MINING COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?