Cases 41 - 50 of 1,443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 205 Removal from State Court: Enforcement of Foreign Arbital Awards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 205 Removal from State Court: Enforcement of Foreign Arbital Awards
US v. Ben Johnson
as 23-4690
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BEN EARL-JUNIOR JOHNSON, a/k/a Ben Earl Johnson, Jr., a/k/a Ben Earl Johnson, Sr.
Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc. v. Robert Stafford, Jr.
as 23-282
Petitioner:
BOJANGLES' RESTAURANTS, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
ROBERT E. STAFFORD, JR., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, MELISSA BONETTI, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, HERBERT MALLET, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Polk v. Villages at Morgan Metro et al
as 8:2023cv02761
Plaintiff:
Shae'Nika Polk
Defendant:
Villages at Morgan Metro, Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A., Matthew M. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
