Cases 41 - 50 of 174
Rodriguez Sanchez v. Peralta-Rangel
as 5:2020cv00195
Petitioner:
Norma Edith Rodriguez Sanchez
Respondent:
Mr. Justino Fausto Peralta-Rangel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
Rodriguez Sanchez v. Peralta-Rangel DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. New case number 5:20-cv-195-D.
as 4:2020cv00077
Petitioner:
Norma Edith Rodriguez Sanchez
Respondent:
Mr. Justino Fausto Peralta-Rangel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
In Re: Sanchez McPherson
as 20-223
Petitioner:
In re: SANCHEZ OZELL MCPHERSON, a/k/a Delano Jacob McPherson, a/k/a Chez, a/k/a Delano MacPherson
Tito Knox v. Elizabeth Magera
as 20-1317
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH G. MAGERA, US Probation Officer in her Individual and official capacity and SERGIO A. SANCHEZ, Psychiatric in his Individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITO LEMONT KNOX
Williams et al v. Holiday Inn Club Vacations et al
as 4:2020cv00997
Plaintiff:
Shelly Adam, Gwendolyn Barilleux, Lisa Manno and others
Defendant:
Orange Lake Resorts, Roe Corporations, 1-10, Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv00175
Defendant:
ELCI WIJAYANINGSIH and BRAD JOHNSON
Counter Defendant:
EFREN SALDIVAR, ERIKA L. SANCHEZ, ASSURANT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
US v. Bonifacio Sanchez
as 20-4061
Defendant / Appellee:
BONIFACIO FERNANDEZ SANCHEZ
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dilma Sanchez-Sanchez v. William Barr
as 19-2185
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
I.Y.S. and DILMA ARELY SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. JUAREZ SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2019cv01007
Defendant:
REY BAR II NIGHT CLUB, LLC and DOULGAS EDUARDO JUAREZ SANCHEZ
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
