Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Juan Moreno Colindres v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1533
Petitioner:
JUAN ANTONIO MORENO COLINDRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
CARMONA v. MORENO
as 1:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
MARCOS GRANADOS CARMONA
Defendant:
NATHALIE AYARY NAVA MORENO
Jasmin Palacios-Moreno v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1714
Petitioner:
JASMIN BEATRIZ PALACIOS-MORENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Roberto Cruz Moreno
as 23-4361
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO CARLOS CRUZ MORENO, a/k/a Solo, a/k/a Veloz, a/k/a Loony
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Adilio et al
as 8:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Santos Adilio, Edwin Moreno Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders and/or principals of Carbonero, Inc. d/b/a El Carbonero Restaurant and Carbonero, Inc. doing business as El Carbonero Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
US v. Blanco Rodriguez
as 22-4480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BLANCO NAYALI MORENO RODRIGUEZ
US v. Christian Hernandez Moreno
as 22-4218
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTIAN HERNANDEZ MORENO
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER, a/k/a Dwayne Baker
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN T. GILMORE, Warden, A. HICKS, Assistant Warden, K. H. TUCKER, Institutional Ombudsman and others
Defendant:
COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region, MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region and others
Maria Monge-De Moreno v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1955
Petitioner:
MARIA MARTA MONGE-DE MORENO and ANGEL MANUEL MORENO-MONGE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Johnnie Simmons, Jr. v. Dale Moreno
as 21-7170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNIE R. SIMMONS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DALE MORENO, Doctor/Medical Supervisor and HODGE, Nurse (Practitioner) Charge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
