Cases 1 - 10 of 26
John Castro v. Andrew Warner
as 24-1040
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF STATE ANDREW M. WARNER and DONALD J. TRUMP
Intervenor:
WEST VIRGINIA REPUBLICAN PARTY and STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
Grant v. PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC et al
as 9:2022cv04262
Plaintiff:
Terry Lennette Grant
Defendant:
PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC, Peter Wolf, Esq, WOLF & MOGIL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Judson Witham v. US
as 21-2071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUDSON WITHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TERRENCE W. BOYLE, INTERNATIONAL PAPER AND POWER INC. and others
Whewell v. Saul
as 1:2021cv01087
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Heather Whewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Russell v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00683
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Russell
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Diana Cantu-Guerrero v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 20-2036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KERRY CONSTATINE, BEATRICE BELL, CARINNE D. KARLICK and others
Appellant:
DIANA CANTU-GUERRERO
Defendant / Appellee:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Shea v. Saul
as 8:2020cv00774
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Stephen F. Shea
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Scott Dawling v. Andrew Saul
as 20-1129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT M. DAWLING
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security and ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Trenica Mingo v. Andrew Saul
as 20-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRENICA RASHELL SMITH MINGO
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration and ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
