Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Columbus Emergency Group, LLC et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
as 7:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
Columbus Emergency Group, LLC, Sylva Emergency Group, LLC, Jones Lake Emergency Group, PC and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Kattato v. Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.
as 7:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Dino Kattato
Defendant:
Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
FTC v. Andris Pukke
as 23-1742
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, PETER BAKER, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco Futures Development, Eco Futures Bel and JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and
Defendant:
ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation, ECO FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a company organized under the laws of Belize, BUY BELIZE, LLC, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, d/b/a Kanantik, d/b/a Laguna Palms, d/b/a Bamboo Springs, a California limited liability company and others
Respondent:
CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JULIE SANTOS and others
Trustee:
CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
Receiver:
MARC-PHILIP FERZAN
Webster v. Webster/Cross
as 1:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Chris L. Webster
Defendant:
Leanne Webster/Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In re: Fermin Aldabe
as 23-1213
Appellant:
In re: FERMIN ALDABE
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and, ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation and others
Respondent:
CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JOHN A. SARACENO and others
Trustee:
CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
C. Holmes v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, Inc.
as 23-1043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. HOLMES
Defendant / Appellee:
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., J. DOE #1 THROUGH J. DOE #X, SCOTT MCCARTHA and others
STARK v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRA STARK
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION and CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
