Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Amazon.com, Inc. v. WDC Holdings LLC
as 23-1991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON DATA SERVICES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
WDC HOLDINGS LLC, d/b/a Northstar Commercial Partners, BRIAN WATSON, STERLING NCP FF, LLC and others
Defendant:
RENRETS LLC
US v. Casey Evans
as 22-4307
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CASEY LEE EVANS, a/k/a James Casey Lee Evans
Casey Tyler v. Scotland Correctional Institution
as 21-7682
Petitioner / Appellant:
CASEY RAFAEL TYLER
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. WDC Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2021mc00168
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Data Services, Inc.
Defendant:
WDC Holdings LLC doing business as Northstar Commercial Partners, Brian Watson, Sterling NCP FF, LLC and others
Interpleader:
800 Hoyt LLC, WDC Holdings, LLC, PLW Capital I, LLC and others
Receiver:
Mark A. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 754
Donat Porter v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONAT CALEB PORTER
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, JOSHUA STEIN, Attorney General of North Carolina, ROXANN VANEEKHOVEN and others
Joseph McGhee Bey v. US
as 21-7364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH CASEY MCGHEE BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
US v. Kacey Hicks
as 21-6915
Defendant / Appellant:
KACEY HICKS, a/k/a Casey Hicks
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ronald Timmons v. Casey Campbell
as 21-6586
Defendant / Appellee:
CASEY CAMPBELL and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD TIMMONS
Donat Porter v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1094
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES ROMINGER, BENJAMIN G. GOFF, CITY OF CONCORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONAT CALEB PORTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
