Cases 1 - 10 of 50
VAUGHN v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
CARL DAVIS VAUGHN, JR
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and BRIAN D. SAVOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lorusso v. Duke Energy Company
as 3:2022cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Lorusso
Defendant:
Duke Energy Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NAUGLE et al v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
KIM NAUGLE and AFRIKA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and WAKEMED
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire and Electronics Communications Act
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. WP RE Ventures 1, LLC
as 3:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Defendant:
WP RE Ventures 1, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
NOC Properties, LLC et al v. Great Smoky Mountains Railroad, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00170
Counter Defendant:
NOC Retail, LLC, Nantahala Outdoor Center, LLC, NOC Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
NC Department of Transportation, Swain County, U.S. Forest Service and others
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Great Smoky Mountains Railroad, LLC
BINOTTI v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2020cv00470
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
LUCIA BINOTTI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
