Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Mey v. Pintas et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
William Pintas, P&M Law Firm, LLC, P&M Law Firm (PR), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mey v. Levin, Papantonio, Rafferty, Proctor, Buchanan, OBrien, Barr, & Mougey P.A. et al
as 5:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
Levin, Papantonio, Rafferty, Proctor, Buchanan, OBrien, Barr, & Mougey P.A., Principal Law Group, LLC, MCM Services Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
In Re: Subpoena Issued to Fredeking & Biser Law Offices, PLLC
as 3:2021mc00098
In Re:
Subpoena Issued to Fredeking & Biser Law Offices, LLC
Petitioner:
Sowards Oil Field Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John R. Giese
Defendant:
Tetra Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoke et al v. USDA Rural Development Rural Housing Services et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Pritt, The Estates of, Pritt Law Firm, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cathy Hoke and Donnie Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bowman v. Panepinto Law Office et al
as 5:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Panepinto Law Office and Mark D. Panepinto
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Riddle v. Atkins & Ogle Law Offices, LC
as 3:2019cv00249
Plaintiff:
Bobbi J. Riddle
Defendant:
Atkins & Ogle Law Offices, LC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01267
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
