Cases 1 - 10 of 25
FCIP, LLC v. INDO-MIM, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
FCIP, LLC
Defendant:
INDO-MIM, Inc and Sig Sauer, Inc.
Alice Guan v. Gary Bell
as 21-2397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALICE GUAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BELL, SERGEY KATSENELENBOGEN, JEN KIM and others
Alice Guan v. Gary Bell
as 21-1996
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALICE GUAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BELL, SERGEY KATSENELENBOGEN, JEN KIM and others
Wayne Johnson v. Hackney
as 21-7040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER HACKNEY, GREGORY MIMS and HUDGINS, Warden
Guan v. Bell et al
as 1:2021cv00752
Defendant:
Charles S Russell, Cleo E. Powell, The Alexandria Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
George Mims v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 21-1654
Defendant / Appellee:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECILIA MIMS and GEORGE MIMS
Kenisha Gregory v. Currituck County
as 21-1363
Defendant / Appellee:
CURRITUCK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, BILL NEWNS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENISHA GREGORY and HUMBLE BEGINNINGS CHILD CARE, INC.
Edward Nellson v. John Doe
as 21-6206
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Warden of USP Hazelton, LEIGH BIRD, JOHN DOE, SHU Lt at USP Hazelton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD NELLSON
Daniel Allen v. R. David Mitchell
as 20-6425
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY MCKOY, JUANITA R. JAMES, COLBERT L. RESPASS and others
Defendant:
TERRY LEMON, GEORGE T. SOLOMON, CHRISTOPHER RICH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL L. ALLEN
Rhonda Kirschmann v. State of Virginia
as 19-2335
Defendant / Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT, NANCY PARR, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Chesapeake, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA KIRSCHMANN, and those similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
