Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kevin Adams v. Mark Elrich
as 20-1988
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN PATRICK MORRISSEY, Chief Judge District Court Headquarters Maryland Judicial Center, in his official and or non-official capacity, JASON CAREW, Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, in his official and non-official capacity, JOHN HAFER, Parole and Probation in his official and or non-official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN CHRISTOPHER ADAMS
Andrew High v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 20-1150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HATTIE TUCKER, RAQUAN SCARBOROUGH, LILLIE WAYMON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA BATTS, SETH WALSTON, JR., DON WEBB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC
Rubin v. BSB Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00280
Defendant:
John W. Gahan III, BSB Bancorp, Inc., John A. Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Pfizer, Inc. v. State of West Virginia ex rel.
as 13-255
Petitioner:
PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, PFIZER, INCORPORATED, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Respondent:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EX REL. PATRICK MORRISSEY, Attorney General
TD Bank, N.A. v. Advanced Career Technologies, Inc. et al
as 8:2013mc00068
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Advanced Career Technologies, Inc., Advanced Career Technologies-Maryland, LLC, The Career Institute, LLC and others
Receiver:
Francis C. Morrissey
Weinman v. Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund
as 3:2007mc00204
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Weinman
Defendant:
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund, Mohsen Abrishami, Elham Shaikhy and others
McAlvey et al v. Franklin Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2004cv01274
Plaintiff:
Ryan McAlvey , Franklin Strategic Series, Franklin Templeton Funds and others
Defendant:
Franklin Resources, Inc. , Franklin Advisors, Inc., Templeton/Franklin Investment Services, Inc. and others
Objector:
Elena M. David, Arlene J. Stach and David G mackenzie
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
