Cases 1 - 10 of 21
US v. Teofilo Cervin
as 23-7191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TEOFILO SALINAS CERVIN, a/k/a Enrique Sandoval Arizmendi
Luis Maurad-Salinas v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1633
Petitioner:
LUIS MARCELO MAURAD-SALINAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Alejandro Garcia
as 23-6490
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO SALINAS GARCIA, a/k/a Alex
Maria Salinas De Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1455
Petitioner:
MARIA LAURA SALINAS DE HERNANDEZ and A.J.S.H.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Frank Fuentes v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1165
Petitioner:
FRANK EDGARDO PALACIO FUENTES, a/k/a Francis Edgardo Palacios Fuentes, a/k/a Jose Antonio Rivera-Adame, a/k/a Jose Luis Estrada-Contreas, a/k/a Jose Alfredo Contreras-Salinas
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Menjivar et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2021cv02355
Plaintiff:
Lennis Landaverde Menjivar, Fernando Turcios Escobar, Ada Rodas Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
US v. Alejandro Garcia
as 20-6075
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO SALINAS GARCIA, a/k/a Alex
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SEC v. Thomas Ellis
as 19-2161
3Rd Party Defendant:
GRIFFITH THOMAS ELLIS and ANDREW HUTCHISON
Defendant:
YASUO ODA, NORTH STAR FINANCE LLC, GOODWILL FUNDING INC., Relief Defendants and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CHAREL WINSTON, Relief Defendants, THOMAS G. ELLIS and THOMAS H. VETTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
US v. Jose Serin-Salinas
as 19-4044
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE DANILO SERIN-SALINAS, a/k/a Antonio Denis Evereth Salazar
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
