Cases 1 - 9 of 9
In re: Brooke Crump, Attorney
as 22-2124
Petitioner / Appellant:
BROOKE M. CRUMP
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN R. NANCE and NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR
Appellant:
In re: BROOKE CRUMP, Attorney
The North Carolina State Bar v. Crump
as 5:2022cv00371
Petitioner:
The North Carolina State Bar
Respondent:
Brooke M. Crump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Valerie Arroyo v. Southwood Realty Company
as 21-1922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, in its official capacity, DAN W. RATCHFORD, in his official and personal capacities, HERMAN RATCHFORD, JR., in his official and personal capacities and others
Ricky Ingram v. David Folmar, Jr.
as 19-7310
Defendant / Appellee:
BAR ASSOCIATION, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, ANNA MILLS WAGONER and DAVID PAUL FOLMAR, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY MCKINLEY INGRAM
Livingston v. North Carolina State Bar et al
as 7:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Livingston
Defendant:
North Carolina State Bar and 13th District Bar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matemu v. The North Carolina State Bar
as 5:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Japheth N. Matemu
Defendant:
The North Carolina State Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LegalZoom.com, Inc. v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, THE et al
as 1:2015cv00438
Plaintiff:
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, THE, RONALD L. GIBSON, Joshua T Walthall and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. V. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, THE , RONALD L. GIBSON , JOSHUA T. WALTHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
El-Bey v. The North Carolina State Bar et al
as 5:2015mc00004
Petitioner:
Dianne Michele Carter El-Bey
Respondent:
The North Carolina State Bar and David R. Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
