Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NOTASH et al v. TOTAL MILITARY MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00890
Defendant:
FAYETTEVILLE MOVING & STORAGE, INC., TOTAL MILITARY MANAGEMENT, INC., A-WORLD MOVING SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID NOTASH and KELLY HAMLIN
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Interstate Freight Claim (Carmack Amendment)
United Van Lines LLC v. Tocco
as 4:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines LLC
Defendant:
Natalie Tocco
Hern v. United Van Lines, LLC
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Alan Hern
Defendant:
United Van Lines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11706 Carmack Amendent
Boone v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00486
Plaintiff:
Robert E Boone, Robert E Boone, Robert E Boone and others
Defendant:
Atlas Van Lines, Inc., Allied Van Lines, Inc., North American Van Lines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
United Van Lines, LLC v. Padron
as 1:2008cv00064
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Honorio Padron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
UNITED VAN LINES, LLC v. PARKS et al
as 1:2007cv00957
Plaintiff:
UNITED VAN LINES, LLC
Defendant:
ERIC PARKS and JERIE PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United Van Lines, LLC v. Savoie
as 1:2007cv00847
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Gerald Savoie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Moad et al v. Atlas Van Lines Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02861
Plaintiff:
Gary Moad and Laurel Moad
Defendant:
Atlas Van Lines Inc, Atlas World Group Inc, Allied Van Lines Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Beach et al v. Atlas Van Lines Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00764
Plaintiff:
Donald J Beach, Donald J Beach, Donald J Beach and others
Defendant:
Atlas Van Lines Inc, Atlas Van Lines Inc, Allied Van Lines Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
