Cases 1 - 10 of 86
In re: Zefeng Chen
as 24-1319
Petitioner:
In re: ZEFENG CHEN, a/k/a Richard, ZHUOGING LU, NINGBO C.F. ELECTRONIC TECH CO., LTD. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Olulo LLC v. Chen Yan
as 23-1190
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OLULO LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
CHEN YAN and LOLO SURGICAL LLC
US v. Xiao Chen
as 23-4063
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
XIAO QI CHEN
Chen v. Mayorkas et al
as 8:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Jin Chen
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and Kirt Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Olulo LLC v. Yan et al
as 1:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Olulo LLC
Defendant:
Chen Yan and Lolo Surgical LLC
Chen v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Zhuo Chen
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department Of State, U.S. Embassy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Freedom Ford, Inc. et al v. Chen et al
as 2:2022cv00404
Defendant:
Wei Chen, Robert Chen, Erika Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Freedom Ford, Inc. doing business as Priority Ford and Priority Imports Battlefield, Inc. doing business as Priority Honda Chesapeake
Tejankar et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 8:2022cv01556
Plaintiff:
SANJAY DNYANDEO TEJANKAR, VARSHADEVI RAMESH PATIL and TANUSHREE SANJAY TEJANKAR
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ya-Mei Chen
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Xing Chen v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2072
Petitioner:
XING GUO CHEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
