Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Mason v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 0:2015cv01882
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Scott Mason
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and Wardell Hopkins, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eaton v. Tillinghast et al
as 1:2014cv02004
Plaintiff:
Ernest Wayne Eaton
Defendant:
Edward F Tillinghast, United Parcel Service, Inc. and Old Republic Insurance, Co.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Dixon et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Dixon, Sr. and Christina Dixon
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Robert C. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jacobs et al v. Canady, II et al
as 7:2010cv00185
Plaintiff:
Nancy Locklear Jacobs and Cecil Allen Butler
Defendant:
Paul T Canady, II , Worldwide Dedicated Services, Inc. , United Parcel Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Kelsey v. Katz Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00724
Plaintiff:
Ronar Kelsey
Defendant:
Katz Trucking, Inc., Cory E. Newman, UPS Ground Freight, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ahmed v. Schlling et al
as 1:2009cv03390
Plaintiff:
Atia T. Ahmed
Defendant:
Donald D. Shilling and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Brinson v. David et al
as 3:2008cv00200
Plaintiff:
Mark Brinson
Defendant:
Dennis David, Dennis David, United Parcel Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cherry et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00403
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kelly Monique Cherry, Christopher Ingram, Jermaine Phillipe Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Gokee v. Davis et al
as 3:2007cv00542
Plaintiff:
Carol Gokee
Defendant:
Dennis Davis, Dennis Davis, United Parcel Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
