Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Carl McAdoo v. US
as 15-1938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL E. MCADOO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Department of Veterans Affairs) in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally, DR. ERNEST T. AHL, JR., in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally, DR. SONNY W. TUCKER, JR., in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally and others
Williams et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11939
Plaintiff:
Sandy Williams and John Williams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv09887
Plaintiff:
Sandi S. Anderson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Polasek et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08836
Plaintiff:
Sandy Polasek and Glenn Polasek
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stoinski et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08667
Plaintiff:
Sandy Stoinski and Kenneth Stoinski
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zoll v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08165
Plaintiff:
Sandy Zoll
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Jaggars v. Sandy Spring Bank
as 15-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JAGGARS
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDY SPRING BANK
Ballweber et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03547
Plaintiff:
Sandy Ballweber and Don Ballweber
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gorst et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv01112
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gorst and Sandie M Gorst
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ouimette et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv02683
Plaintiff:
Sandy Ouimette and Gary Ouimette
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
