Cases 61 - 70 of 204
Coleman v. United States of America, The
as 2:2016cv02405
Plaintiff:
Shalisa Coleman
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Coleman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04079
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Coleman and Gary Coleman, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02899
Plaintiff:
Patricia Coleman and Eugene Thornton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fielder v. R.V. Coleman Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jason Fielder
Defendant:
R.V. Coleman Trucking, Inc. and Arkos Field Services, LP
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
R.V. Coleman Trucking, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
MEC Construction, LLC
Cross_claimant:
Arkos Field Services, LP
Cross_defendant:
R.V. Coleman Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Coleman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv16171
Plaintiff:
Brandi Coleman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pumphrey v. Coakley et al
as 5:2015cv14430
Plaintiff:
William C. Pumphrey
Defendant:
Joe Coakley, O. Gibson, J. D. James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Coleman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv14711
Plaintiff:
Betty Jean Coleman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv04158
Plaintiff:
Mary Coleman
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman-Chang v. Eighensehr
as 1:2015cv02907
Plaintiff:
Yvette Coleman-Chang
Defendant:
Bobbi Jo Eighensehr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America Ex rel. Franklin Harris v. Coleman American Moving Services Inc et al
as 3:2015cv03933
Plaintiff:
United States of America Ex rel. Franklin Harris
Defendant:
Coleman American Moving Services Inc and Coleman World Group LLC
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
