Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Chong et al v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation
as 3:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Chong and Bernard Rawls
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bernard B Chong v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01981
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard B Chong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ellerbe v. Peel et al
as 4:2019cv01333
Plaintiff:
Cherelle Ellerbe
Defendant:
John Chong Peel and AAR of North Carolina Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hicks et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03393
Plaintiff:
Petra Higgs, Regina (I) Hull, Wilfred Berthiaume and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., National Foam Inc, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03412
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Bernardo, Scott (I) Coddington, Karen Essendrop and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc., National Foam Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chong Yi v. Abdoulaye Diene
as 17-1048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHONG SU YI
Defendant - Appellee:
ABDOULAYE DIENE and WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INCORPORATED
Yi v. Diene et al
as 8:2016cv03653
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Abdoulaye Diene and Whole Foods Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yi v. Progress place et al
as 8:2016cv02143
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Progress place and Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yi v. Progress place et al
as 8:2016cv02146
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Progress place and Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yi v. Progress place et al
as 8:2016cv02145
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Progress place and Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
