Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Clark et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv00692
Defendant:
3M Company, Beaty Investments Inc, Fluor Constructors International and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Payne Clark and Shannon Payne Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ratliff et al v. Avon Products Inc et al
as 7:2019cv02570
Defendant:
Coty Inc, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Breentag Specialties Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ennis Ratliff and Lynda Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns v. Sally Hansen Div Dist et al
as 3:2015cv05060
Plaintiff:
Brenda Burns
Defendant:
Sally Hansen Div Dist, Dell Laboratories Inc and Coty US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clara Mosko v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 15-2252
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLARA G. MOSKO
Defendant - Appellant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company and others
Clara Mosko v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 13-1840
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLARA G. MOSKO
Defendant - Appellant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company and others
Mosko v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01781
Plaintiff:
Clara G. Mosko
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. , Hampshire Industries, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. , J.H. France Refractories Co. , Coty, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company , Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Eby et al v. Grove
as 1:2009cv01413
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Eby and Cynthia Eby
Defendant:
Coty M. Grove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
