Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pelachik v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
David N Pelachik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dressler v. Jefferson County, WV et al
as 2:2018cv01126
Defendant:
Stephanie F. Grove, West Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles, Un-Known Police Officer and others
Plaintiff:
David N. Dressler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dressler v. Jefferson County, WV et al
as 3:2018cv00100
Defendant:
Stephanie F. Grove, West Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles, Un-Known Police Officer and others
Plaintiff:
David N. Dressler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swanner v. Dunlap, et al
as 4:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Linda Swanner
Defendant:
David N. Dunlap and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baraw et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30027
Plaintiff:
Joyce Baraw and David N. Baraw
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prevallet et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10155
Plaintiff:
Gladys H. Prevallet and David N. Prevallet
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pringle-Hatch et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31509
Plaintiff:
Pamela Pringle-Hatch and David N. Hatch
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pringle-Hatch et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05885
Plaintiff:
Pamela Pringle-Hatch and David N. Hatch
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Inheritance Funding Company Inc v. Chatman et al
as 3:2012cv01308
Plaintiff:
Inheritance Funding Company Inc
Defendant:
Darial Chatman, Calvin Chatman, Kimberly Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
