Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Smith v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02838
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Smith et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv01087
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Smith and Bette Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00470
Plaintiff:
Sherry Smith and William James Smith, III
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv29425
Plaintiff:
Barbara Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29405
Plaintiff:
Carol J. Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25923
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv11301
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00551
Plaintiff:
Melody A. Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv27809
Plaintiff:
Betty Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
