Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Means v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01491
Plaintiff: Kenneth Means and Kenneth R. Means
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Lashanta Means v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01318
Defendant: 3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff: Lashanta Means
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Means v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00526
Plaintiff: Christina Gail Means
Defendant: Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Means v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04179
Plaintiff: Vickie Means
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Means v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10021
Plaintiff: Sandra Means
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Means v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv14767
Plaintiff: Brenda Means
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Means v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv01121
Plaintiff: Sharon L Means
Defendant: Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Means v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv21674
Plaintiff: Sharron Means
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abram et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv13957
Plaintiff: Dorothy Means Abram and James Henry Abram
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Means et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv05259
Plaintiff: Kimberly S. Means and Michael Means
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?