Cases 1 - 6 of 6
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erik Phillips v. Pneumo Abex, LLC
as 16-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIK ROSS PHILLIPS and TINA LANDERS, spouse
Plaintiff:
GINA PHILLIPS, spouse
Defendant - Appellee:
PNEUMO ABEX, LLC, a/k/a Abex Corporation, f/k/a American Brake Shoe Company, f/k/a American Brake Shoe and Foundry Company, American Brakeblok Division and REDDAWAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ASTENJOHNSON, INC., B E & K INC. and others
Tawney v. AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01194
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor, Inc., CBS Corporation, Eaton Electrical Corporation and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Domco Products Texas Inc., Goodrich Corporation, Navistar Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Tawney
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Frank Houser
Counter Defendant:
Autozone Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
WHITLEY et al v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY LEE WHITLEY and BRENDA WHITLEY
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION , AVCO CORPORATION, CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Moritz v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jean Marie Moritz
Defendant:
3M Company , Borg-Warner Corporation, Dana Companies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. Albany International Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00262
Plaintiff:
Erik Ross Phillips and Gina Phillips
Defendant:
Albany International Corporation, AstenJohnson, Inc., B E & K Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
