Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Shock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE # 5:23-CV-466-D-RN
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Bradley Shock
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and David Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Shock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Bradley Shock
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and David Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patterson v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Patterson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patterson v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 3:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Patterson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra Job Discrimination (Race)
Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. SMITH
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Allen v. Wells Fargo
as 5:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen
Defendant:
Wells Fargo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
