Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Chante' Hodge v. Randy Stephen
as 13-1419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANTE' N. HODGE and HAROLD H. HODGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY L. STEPHENS, individual and government capacity, SEARGENT MERKELSON, (MSP), individual and government capacity, SEARGENT BEACH, individual and government capacity and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Beverly Perdue
as 12-2238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., as next friend to J.F.D., minor and J. F. D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY PERDUE, individually and in her official capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, WILLIAM C. HARRISON, individually and in his official capacity as Chairperson of the North Carolina State Board of Education, ROSA U. GILL, individually and in her official capacity as Chairperson of the North Carolina State Board of Education and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Franklin Reaves v. Mark Richardson
as 11-2339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK RICHARDSON, Individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Marion County, ALBERT WOODBURY, Individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Marion County, LEVON NICHOLS, Individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Marion County and others
Defendant:
SHERRY RHODES, individually and in her official capacity as Marion County Clerk of Court, JERRY VINSON, Individually and in his official capacity as Family Court Judge, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
John Bishop v. County of Macon
as 11-2021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM BISHOP and DONNA J. BISHOP
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MACON, North Carolina, MACON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ROBERT L. HOLLAND, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Macon County and others
Defendant:
MARSH USA, Inc.
DaVon Bell v. Robert Baker
as 11-6589
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVON BELL
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT L. BAKER, Deputy
Defendant:
OCTAVIA L. JOHNSON, individually and in her official capacity as Roanoke City Sheriff, BRANDON YOUNG, individually and in his official capacity as Roanoke City Sheriff's Office Deputy, SHANNON STROOP, Deputy and others
Thomas Vandegrift v. Brandon Young
as 11-6546
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS SCOTT VANDEGRIFT
Plaintiff:
DAVON BELL
Defendant - Appellant:
BRANDON YOUNG, individually and in his official capacity as Roanoke City Sheriff's Office Deputy, KENNETH FERRELL, individually and in his official capacity as Roanoke City Sheriff's Office Deputy and JEWELL PAYNE, individually and in her official capacity as Roanoke City Sheriff's Office Deputy
Defendant:
CITY OF ROANOKE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, OCTAVIA L. JOHNSON, individually and in her official capacity as Roanoke City Sheriff, JOHN DOES, individually and in their official capacity as Roanoke City Sheriff's Office Deputies and others
DaVon Bell v. Brandon Young
as 11-6545
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVON BELL
Defendant - Appellant:
BRANDON YOUNG, individually and in his official capacity as Roanoke City Sheriff's Office Deputy
Defendant:
OCTAVIA L. JOHNSON, individually and in her official capacity as Roanoke City Sheriff, ROBERT L. BAKER, Deputy, SHANNON STROOP, Deputy and others
B. K. Cruey, PC v. Ricky Lee Early
as 10-2330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
B. K. CRUEY, PC and BILLY K. CRUEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN C. HUFF, JR., R. J. KIRBY, Individually, and as Deputy Sheriff, and as agent for J. T. Whitt, Sheriff, and Montgomery County, Virginia, D. L. CONNER, Individually, and as Deputy Sheriff, and as agent for J. T. Whitt, Sheriff, and Montgomery County, Virginia and others
Defendant:
RICKY LEE EARLY, HOWARD M. GREGORY, ERIC NESTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
