Cases 31 - 40 of 11,288
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
HOLSEY-HYMAN v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Monique Holsey-Hyman
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, Kimberly Rehberg, Mark Anthony Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bey v. Carter-Haston et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Hanif Rahim Bey
Defendant:
Carter-Haston, Brownlee Whitlow & Praet, L. Marc Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smith v. Charlotte NC DEA Federal Narcotic Officers
as 3:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Justice Smith
Defendant:
Charlotte NC DEA Federal Narcotic Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ROBERT JONES
Defendant:
THE CITY OF GREENSBORO and GREENSBORO FIRE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Casanova v. Pfizer and Affiliates et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
Pfizer and Affiliates, Actalent Temporary Agency and Affiliates, GRAIL INC. and Affiliates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
