Civil Rights Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Rutledge v. Town of Chatham, Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00035
Defendant: Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, Chatham, Va Police Department, Chief Marvin Wright of the Chatham, Va Police Department and others
Plaintiff: Merle T. Rutledge, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00755
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
White v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2009cv00209
Plaintiff: Stephen W. White
Defendant: The United States Government, The Department of Justice, The U.S. Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Russell v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 4:2009cv00029
Plaintiff: Joseph M. Russell
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia and Attorney General McDonnell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Turner v. Attorney General Of Virginia
as 7:2008cv00342
Plaintiff: John Paul "Pops" Turner
Defendant: Attorney General Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Alatabe v. United States Attorney General et al
as 3:2008cv00140
Plaintiff: Abdullah T. Alatabe
Defendant: United States Attorney General, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None
Wang v. Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2007cv00072
Plaintiff: Hui Wang
Defendant: Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Phillis A. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?