Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Nexus Derechos Humanos Attorneys, Inc. v. City of Norfolk Sheriff Joe Baron et al
as 2:2018cv00486
Plaintiff: Nexus Derechos Humanos Attorneys, Inc.
Defendant: City of Norfolk Sheriff Joe Baron, City of Portsmouth Sheriff Michael A. Moore and City of Chesapeake Sheriff Jim O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Small v. Tate et al
as 2:2018cv00315
Plaintiff: Donna M. Small
Defendant: C. M. Tate , E. A. Ortiz , J. Natiello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00654
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00551
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00445
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00264
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bridget Toole v. City of Norfolk Police Dept.
as 17-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRIDGET AMELIA TOOLE, a/k/a Bridget A. Toole
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00681
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridget Toole v. City of Norfolk Police Dept
as 16-1881
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRIDGET AMELIA TOOLE
Defendant - Appellee: THE CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT
Toole v. The City of Norfolk Police Department
as 2:2016cv00456
Plaintiff: Bridget Amelia Toole
Defendant: The City of Norfolk Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?