Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Pannell v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 4:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Deanna E. Burakowski and Deanna E. Pannell
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Debra L. Massie, Lee W. Bettis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUNBAR v. ALI et al
as 1:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER DUNBAR
Defendant:
ADDUL RAHMAN EL ALI, JACK LAMBERT, CLAY MAGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUTTON, et al v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
TAYLOR CARTER, PAUL HIGGINS, UNNAMED ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY K SUTTON and JUSTIN L. SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HILL V. SCHOOL BOARD OF ROBESON COUNTY, et al
as 1:2018cv00546
Plaintiff:
BETTY JO LOCKLEAR HILL
Defendant:
SCHOOL BOARD OF ROBESON COUNTY and SHENITA WOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
