Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gibson et al v. Frederick County Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
Louis Ann Gibson, Maryland 20-20 Watch, Amicus Curia and others
Defendant:
Frederick County Maryland, Howard County Maryland, Carroll County Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Kim et al
as 8:2019cv03605
Defendant:
Adam C Kim, J and H Beverage Inc. d/b/a Largo Liquors, Jay Chang Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel F Davis and Nathaniel F. Davis, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
West v. Sarrrichio et al
as 8:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
Jerome West
Defendant:
Sarricchio , B. McRae , L. Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lilsack v. Silbermann
as 8:2015cv02309
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Silbermann
Defendant:
Tom Lilsack and Muhtur Kent
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 348
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McMahon v. County Commissioners of Kent County et al
as 1:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Darek Michael McMahon
Defendant:
County Commissioners of Kent County , Kent County Sheriff's Office , Kent County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Yates v. Kent et al
as 1:2010cv02707
Plaintiff:
Melvin James Yates
Defendant:
Sean Kent, J.J. Gibbons and Ryan Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yates v. Kent et al
as 1:2010cv01543
Plaintiff:
Melvin James Yates
Defendant:
Sean Kent, J. J. Gibbons, Ryan Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
