Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Perez Lazarte et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv00893
Defendant: Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Perez Lazarte and Gerson Aguilar Delgadillo
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
David Brat v. Gloria Personhuballah We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1389
Plaintiff - Appellee: GLORIA PERSONHUBALLAH, an individual and JAMES FARKAS, an individual
Plaintiff: DAWN CURRY PAGE, an individual
Defendant: JAMES B. ALCORN, CLARA BELLE WHEELER, SINGLETON B. MCALLISTER and others
Intervenor/Defendant: ERIC CANTOR, Congressman and FRANK WOLF, Congressman
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant: DAVID BRAT, BARBARA COMSTOCK, ROBERT WITTMAN, Congressman and others
: , , and others
Carlos A. Howard v. Robert B. Burger
as 16-2345
Plaintiff - Appellant: CARLOS A. HOWARD and CARLOS A. HOWARD FUNERAL HOME
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT B. BURGER, President at the time of the summary suspension in his official capacity who is also a direct competitor, ROBERT T. MINTER, board member in his official capacity, WALTER BALL, board member in his official capacity and others
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF FUNERAL DIRECTORS AND EMBALMERS, LISA HAHN, in her official capacity as Executive Director, CONNIE STEELE, President current in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1216
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Timothy Bostic v. Michele McQuigg
as 14-1173
Plaintiff - Appellee: TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC, TONY C. LONDON, CAROL SCHALL and others
Defendant: GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III, in his official capacity as the Clerk of Court for Norfolk Circuit Court, JANET M. RAINEY, in her official capacity as State Registrar of Vital Records, ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, in his official capacity as Governor of Virginia and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant: MICHELE MCQUIGG
Timothy Bostic v. Janet Rainey
as 14-1169
Plaintiff - Appellee: TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC, TONY C. LONDON, CAROL SCHALL and others
Defendant - Appellant: JANET M. RAINEY, in her official capacity as State Registrar of Vital Records
Defendant: GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III, in his official capacity as the Clerk of Court for Norfolk Circuit Court, ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, in his official capacity as Governor of Virginia and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Virginia
Intervenor/Defendant: MICHELE MCQUIGG
Timothy Bostic v. George Schaefer, III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1167
Plaintiff - Appellee: TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC, TONY C. LONDON, CAROL SCHALL and others
Defendant - Appellant: GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III, in his official capacity as the Clerk of Court for Norfolk Circuit Court
Defendant: JANET M. RAINEY, in her official capacity as State Registrar of Vital Records, ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, in his official capacity as Governor of Virginia and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Virginia
Intervenor/Defendant: MICHELE MCQUIGG
Saunders et al v. Flaherty et al
as 3:2013cv00854
Plaintiff: Michael J. G. Saunders and William S. MacDonald
Defendant: W. Steven Flaherty and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Democratic Party of Virginia v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01218
Plaintiff: The Democratic Party of Virginia
Defendant: Virginia State Board of Elections , Charles Judd , Kimberly Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Zargarpur v. Townsend et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01022
Plaintiff: Mattin Zargarpur
Defendant: Dennis Townsend , Danny White , Ron Cavanaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?