Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Hensley v. Engler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00273
Defendant: John A. Engler, North Carolina Medical Board, UNC Health Partners LLC and others
Plaintiff: Jason Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kernan Manion v. North Carolina Medical Board We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2075
Plaintiff - Appellant: KERNAN MANION, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD, NORTH CAROLINA PHYSICIANS HEALTH PROGRAM, INC., NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL SOCIETY and others
Manion v. North Carolina Medical Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00063
Plaintiff: Kernan Manion
Defendant: North Carolina Medical Board , North Carolina Physicians Health Program, Inc. , North Carolina Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Jemsek v. State of North Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1420
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH JEMSEK, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD, JANELLE R. RHYNE, M.D. and others
Jemsek v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2014cv00504
Plaintiff: Joseph Jemsek
Defendant: State of North Carolina , North Carolina Medical Board , Janelle R Rhyne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gretchen Stuart v. Paul Camnitz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1150
Plaintiff - Appellee: GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant - Appellant: JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant: JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff / Appellee: GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant: JANICE E. HUFF, M.D., in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant: JOHN M. THORP, JR., M.D., GREGORY J. BRANNON, M.D., CHIMERE COLLINS and others
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1052
Plaintiff - Appellee: GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant: JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant: JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD, GREGORY J. BRANNON, MD, CHIMERE COLLINS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?