Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Robertson v. Virginia State University et al
as 3:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Bridgett P. Robertson
Defendant:
Virginia State University, Makola M. Abdullah, Ph.D., Tia A. Minnis, Ph.D and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Zehrbach v. Laria et al
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Darus Zehrbach
Defendant:
Mark J Laria, Jefte Cabantac Owen and Multiple unknown or as yet by name not identified US Customs Norfolk and US DOT Norfolk agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Moseley v. Meggison et al
as 2:2021cv00651
Plaintiff:
Litonia Victoria Dozier Moseley
Defendant:
Antron Depaul Meggison, Shelly Rodgers, Meosha Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00762
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01518
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Owens v. Lucas et al
as 3:2018cv00596
Plaintiff:
Terry Owens
Defendant:
Deputy Lucas, Deputy Hill and Sergeant Spain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Comey, Jr. et al
as 3:2017cv00798
Plaintiff:
Kim L. Franklin
Defendant:
James Brien Comey, Jr., John Owen Brennan, James R. Clapper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
